cgd-pf-tc

Tommy Crawford

grade: 42%

The log seems OK. It lacks the bite of I-was-there reality and feels a bit clinical/sanitised. Tell it like it is/was. I liked the next sections on influences and thinking. This also flags up for you the limitations of working only from personal experience. Be willing to stretch out and see what else might be influential: movies, books, graphics novels, television, retro stuff, ...

Then you run out of steam. I suppose this is about personal reflection, so saying I don't like personal reflection isn't an answer. Mebbes one day someone will prove that this is a pointless task and should be avoided. For now there is a general consensus it is the best we have, and so we should improve it. Just take a single positive and investigate it. then take a single negative then investigate it. the idea is: what would I (not) do again next time?