seab-td-f

=Team Seabass=

Tech Doc Feedback

 * readability - get some structure on your document. see headings below ... (also, blue and red for text colours?). Tables and diagrams to show numbers rather than in with the sea of text.
 * target platform - you've not clearly stated what your target platform is
 * dev kit - unreal editor and unreal tournament engine are not the same! Clarify how are you getting the engine, which one are you using.
 * staffing - poor breakdown of staff tasks. How many coders, artists, sound engineers, designers, secretarial staff, producers, QA testers ...
 * costing - this £3M seems like a rather random figure. It looks like you have doubled the cost of development to give the marketers, then doubled your total cost to get your budget ... what costs for hardware, software, rent etc.
 * payback - selling at £40, how will this cover the costs. Remember that the publisher, government (VAT), retailer, and others will take their chunk of the cash (most of it)

Summary - needs a lot of work before it's of a reasonable standard for a tech document

//Draft Mark: 25%//

Final Feedback: The document is better than the original submission, but there's still a lot of room for improvement. Break up the text a bit with diagrams and tables, and make it easier to read. I have given an unbalanced set of marks to this group as there is evidence that Robert Reid performed the majority of the work.

Robert Reid: 45% Raymond Mooney, Jon Robertson & Christopher Sutherland: 20%**
 * Final Marks: