cgd2lo

=Lloyd Orr=


 * clips** - nice group of fotos of testing. Could do with more commentary on each one. Pity we didn't manage to gather in some videos clips of the testing. Mebbes next time ... So, overall, good B2 (56%)


 * personal report** - a good account of events. This would be useful material in such as a eprsonal submission for an internal review of a project. The details of who did what are well presented, as is the fairness - which i agree with - that everyone did different tasks but contributed equally. It was a good team, perhaps mroe could have been achieved, but that is the main purpose in some ways of this document: what would you do different next time? The team worked well tgoether, which leaves little bad to reflect upon, but why do you reckon the team worked well? It is good to even reflect upon success, rather just upon failure, cos its good to try to recreate success next time too. So, more reflectionj need with an eye to the future. B2 (58%)


 * QA Plan** - the QA plan is a good copy of the QA document, but does not show such as timings, target audiences, data analysis approaches, actions planned, etc. A plan should say all these things too - D (32%)


 * roll-out plan** - there is a little bit at the end of page 25 and 26 of the design document supplied. It does show some detail, but again falls short of a proper plan. This worries me - the class seems to have no idea what a planning document or process actually is. I'll need to think about hiow this affects the group honours projects next year to ensure you catch up on this - D (25%)


 * QA data presentation** - this is done neatly and well. I can see the numbers, which aren't exaggerated (e.g. the right number of significant digits is presented) and words aren't subsumed by numbers in the presentation. Nothing is hid. A clean report. B1 (62%)


 * QA data analysis** - this is also well presented. I like the reflective though, responding not just emotionally to players comments, but thinking which ones actually mean anything, in your opinion, and proposing improvements which could be made. A good analysis from such small data (which isn't a criticism of the dataset, just an acknowledgement of its size.) A (75%)